Published April 22, 2025
Reading time: 4 minutes
By Lesia Tello & Jordy Munarriz
In the highlands, where life can be harsh and the land unforgiving, people have long depended on each other to survive. Since pre-Inca times, the Andean concept of ayni—sacred reciprocity—has guided daily life. No field was planted, no home built, without the help of neighbors. Then, when another family needed support, the favor was returned. This cycle of shared effort created strong communities where what benefits one ultimately benefits all.
But ayni isn’t just about people. This principle of reciprocity extends to Pachamama herself. The Earth gives us everything—water, food, materials, beauty—and so in ayni, people must give thanks and care in return. Offering to Pachamama is one of Peru’s oldest sacred rituals. Even today, in farming villages nestled among terraced hills, you’ll find ceremonies called pagos a la tierra (payments to the Earth) at the start of the sowing season and after the harvest. At these times, families prepare offerings to Pachamama that might include coca leaves, maize, or chicha beer, which are gently buried or burned so that the essence “feeds” the Earth [12].
As one travel chronicler notes, Pachamama “receives offerings at planting and harvesting times in the Andes”, a tradition of gratitude that has persisted despite centuries of change. The Pachamama is not an abstract concept here—she is mother, provider, and protector. In Quechua belief, she inhabits the mountains and valleys, feeling every festival drumbeat and every footstep on her soil. By honoring her, the Andean people affirm a relationship of respect: take care of nature, and nature will take care of you.
Authors & Researchers
Jordy Munarriz
Environmental Engineer with a master’s degree in renewable energy and a specialization in sustainability. A passionate traveler and advocate for responsible tourism, he captures the essence of exploration through storytelling, inspiring others to connect with nature in a conscious and meaningful way.
References:
[1] Thornthwaite, C. W. (1933). The climates of the earth. Geographical Review, 23(3), 433-440.
[2] Málaga, E. (2004). Perú: informe anual 2004. El Censo Neotropical de Aves Acuáticas, 83-86.
[3] Ministerio del Ambiente (MINAM). (2010). Guía de Evaluación de la Fauna Silvestre. Lima, Perú.
[4] Tito, R., Salinas, N., Cosio, E. G., Espinoza, T. E. B., Muñiz, J. G., Aragón, S., ... & Roman-Cuesta, R. M. (2022). Secondary forests in Peru: differential provision of ecosystem services compared to other post-deforestation forest transitions. Ecology and Society, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13446-270312
[5] Schuler, I., & de Jaramillo, E. H. (2011). The potential of biodiversity in the Andean region: Use, conservation and regulations. Biological Diversity and Sustainable Resources Use, 77.
[6] Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853-858.
[7] Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. (s. f.). Tropical Andes. https://www.cepf.net/our-work/biodiversity-hotspots/tropical-andes
[8] Ministerio del Ambiente [Minam]. (2019). Sexto informe nacional sobre diversidad biológica. La biodiversidad en cifras. Recuperado de https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/360831/La_Biodiversidad_en_Cifras_final.pdf
[9] Informática (Peru). (2019). Anuario de estadísticas ambientales. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1704/libro.pdf
[10] Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian. (s. f.). Reciprocity—Andean Style and in Your Community. https://americanindian.si.edu/nk360/inka-water/reciprocity/reciprocity
[11] Kuokkanen, R. (2011). Indigenous economies, theories of subsistence, and women: Exploring the social economy model for Indigenous governance. American Indian Quarterly, 35(2), 215-240.
[12] Paponnet-Cantat, C. (1996). Deathly Waters and Hungry Mountains: Agrarian Ritual and Class Formation in an Andean Town. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 33(2), 242+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A18585438/AONE?u=anon~953440e5&sid=googleScholar&xid=fb63652a
